What you get
- A native Elementor build. Flex containers only — no legacy sections, no HTML widgets stuffed with pasted markup, no absolute positioning.
- Your design system in Site Settings. Colours and type styles set globally, so a brand change is one edit rather than ninety.
- Responsive behaviour decided deliberately. Checked at 360px, 768px, 1024px and 1440px — not just the widths your mockup was drawn at.
- Clean, accessible markup. One H1 per page, a correct heading order, alt text on every image, and images served in WebP.
- A site your team can edit. Global styles, real Elementor widgets, sensible nesting, and a short written guide to the handful of things you’ll actually change.
How it works
- You send the Figma file and tell me which artboards are final. I read it before quoting.
- I come back with a fixed price and a page count, plus a note on anything in the file that needs a decision — usually mobile behaviour for sections that were only drawn at desktop.
- I extract the design system first — colours, type scale, spacing rhythm, container width, breakpoints — and set it up in Elementor before building a single section.
- I build page by page, sharing a staging link as it goes so you’re never surprised at the end.
- You review, I revise, then I hand over with the guide and credentials.
Why not use a Figma to Elementor plugin?
Automated converters work the only way they can: by writing fixed coordinates and hard pixel values into the page. The output matches your mockup at exactly one screen width and falls apart at every other one, and nobody can edit it afterwards because each element is welded to a position. The long version of this, with the process I use instead, is in my guide to converting Figma to Elementor.
What drives the price
Every project is quoted as a fixed price against a specific scope, agreed before I start — no hourly meter, no scope surprises. I quote after reading your file rather than from a rate card, because the same page count can be two very different jobs. Five things move the number:
- How many genuinely distinct templates there are, not how many pages. Twelve pages built from four layouts is a smaller job than six pages that are all different.
- Whether the Figma file uses auto-layout properly. Clean auto-layout frames translate almost one-to-one into containers. A file with everything absolutely positioned roughly doubles the layout time, because every frame becomes a judgement call about how it should reflow.
- How much of the page is content-driven. A section typed in once is cheap. A card grid pulling from a custom post type, with filtering, is a different piece of work — usually a custom widget.
- How complete the design is. Missing mobile artboards, undefined hover states and unspecified empty states are all decisions someone has to make. I’d rather agree them with you upfront than guess.
- Whether anything non-standard is attached — multi-language, a catalogue, a booking flow, an integration with something you already run.
As a rough guide to timing rather than price: a single landing page from a clean file is typically four to eight hours of work; a five-page marketing site with a design system, two to four days. Anything with custom functionality runs longer and gets quoted separately.
Send the file and you’ll get a real number, not a range.
Recent conversions
- Alpine Eagle — a Figma brand design rebuilt as a multi-page WordPress site, flex-only, handed to the client’s own team.
- Tom the Designer — a designer’s own Figma file, rebuilt with the type scale treated as non-negotiable.
- Actualiza Tec — a two-language build with the enquiry path designed into the pages.
